Not Another AI Success Story—A Caution Worth Remembering
Not Another AI Success Story—A Caution Worth Remembering
Blog Article
In a world racing toward automation, one voice dared to ask: what gets lost when we stop thinking for ourselves?
On a humid morning in Manila’s premier lecture theatre, Joseph Plazo addressed the room not as a prophet of AI, but as its conscience.
---
### A Beginning Like a Whispered Warning
He didn’t come with hype or metrics.
“AI can beat the market. But only if you teach it *when not to try*.”
The silence wasn’t passive. It was alert.
They expected a blueprint for algorithmic supremacy.
They received something else: a question about judgment.
---
### Where AI Fails Isn’t Logic—It’s Life
Plazo moved gently, but deliberately.
He didn’t mock AI’s power—he mapped its blind spots.
He revealed what happens when context escapes the code.
“These are machines,” he said. “Brilliant pattern matchers—but history has a pulse, not just a price. ”
Then he paused. And asked:
“Can your model replicate 2008 panic? Not the numbers. The disbelief. The phone calls. The empty streets.”
---
### When Students Challenged the Master
A researcher from NUS argued AI could parse tone and sentiment in real time.
Plazo nodded. “ Identifying anger isn’t the same get more info as knowing what someone will do in rage.”
Then he added:
“You can map the weather.
But you still don’t know when lightning strikes.”
There were no rebuttals. Just silence—and respect.
---
### Obedience to AI Is Not Intelligence
This was the turn: not about AI’s strength, but ours.
He described traders who no longer analyzed fundamentals—they simply waited for alerts.
“This,” he said, “is not evolution.
It’s abdication.”
But he wasn’t anti-AI. His own systems use deep models.
Then he left the audience with this:
“‘The model told me to do it.’
That will be the new excuse for financial collapse.”
---
### The Region Most Enthralled Was the Most Disturbed
Automation here isn’t just progress. It’s prophecy.
So when Plazo delivered his message, some called it necessary. Others: sacrilege.
Dr. Anton Leung, an AI ethicist from Singapore, said:
“This wasn’t rejection—it was redirection.”
At a closed-door session later, Plazo was asked how to teach AI better.
His reply?
“Teach people how to challenge the model,
not just how to build it.”
---
### Closing Like a Novelist, Not a Technologist
His ending wasn’t about numbers. It was about story.
“The market,” Plazo said,
“ rewards those who understand nuance—not just numbers. Your AI needs to read between the lines.
Professors looked at each other—not to clap, but to reflect.
Joseph Plazo didn’t sell AI that day.
He gave the room something machines can’t generate: clarity.
And for a generation raised on speed, he offered the rarest gift of all:
a reminder that the future still has room for human judgment.